2.11.07

Reza Aslan's Rare Common Sense


Reza Aslan, the brilliant and articulate author of No god but God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam, (which is the Kennedy Center book of the semester) spoke to a full house in the JSB auditorium this afternoon. As a well-read and well-accredited scholar of religion and sociology and also an Iranian-American (he actually said Iranian instead of Persian), he was very qualified to speak about Iranian-American relations in his lecture, "Revolution, Reformation, and Regime Change: Contemporary Iran."

It was fascinating. For instance, he recently visited Iran to do some research and visit some family. When she heard he lived in the United States, one woman asked, "What's it like to live in a theocracy?" So the misunderstanding goes both ways, as he says, "Iran is no more a theocracy than America is." However, since America has begin to threaten Iran, the clerical regime has grown stronger—in the name of national security, of course—and Iran has become paranoid. They think American missiles may rain down on them at any moment.

I'm not doing the lecture justice. I'll post a link to the video version when/if it's available. Basically, Mr Aslan's thesis was that, since thirty years of US sanctions against Iran have only strengthened the clerical regime, employing the China policy is the only way to break the regime. "Revolutions are undertaken by the middle class," he said. "No middle class, not revolution. No middle class, no democracy." Since Iran already has a democratic infrastructure, the transition to true democracy would be quick and relatively easy.

During the question and answer session, a man named Ben from my history and Arabic classes asked Mr Aslan why his book took such a "different approach towards Islam." Mr Aslan kindly explained that the moderate voice of Islam is not the minority, it is not even close to the minority. However, extremists make better TV, so they are featured frequently on American media. I was happy to be one of the ten people in the entire auditorium to raise their hands when he asked who had heard of the recent letter from a representative of every Islamic sect to the Pope and the Christian world. "If you are still looking for the moderate voice in Islam, and have not found it," he said, "you're not looking very hard." We are no longer spoonfed information by the media. We have the capacity to find out things for ourselves.

(So I don't want to attract from how brilliant Mr Aslan is, but I can't not mention how attractive he is: very.)

2 Comments:

Blogger travis said...

Okay, I suppose that because of a relative "minority" or "protected group" status, anything that Mr. Aslan says must be taken as truth and as fact. However, were we on the ground, in the Middle East, I'll bet I could introduce you to several actual "middle class" Arabs, Kurds, Persians, and Pashtuns (did I miss anyone, oh yeah I did!) who would argue the point. I am sure we could all agree there is a difference between Islamo-Fascism and Islam (don't even start, the Talibani and Ba'athist charters both read like Mein Kempf). I counter with the FACT that Sharia Law is one of the most restrictive ordinances ever laid out. There are more Sunna followers of the Hanafi school than the other three combined; it claims to emphasize the reason of man, meaning that it is dependant on any given personal axe that requires grinding.

Mr. Aslan claims that Iranians are confused by our theocratic government, and considering the actions of the leadership that incessantly appears on our respective TV screens, I honestly can't blame THEM. But from a woman student, in pursuit of a Liberal Arts baccalaureate, who is NOT required to be escorted to and supervised during class by a male relative, I suppose I expected more. In Iran, it is the Grand Ayatollah that gives the "thumbs up" or "thumbs down", not Dr. Ahmadinejad. The good Doctor is a puppet left to appease the people to ensure there isn't another 1979. In America, believe it or not, the system of checks and balances and glorified its existence. My point here, is that Iran does in fact have the supreme head of their STATE MANDATED religion also in charge of every routinely secular aspect of life.
I am not even allowed to PRAY while I am in uniform because I am on Uncle Sam's dime. If I die in Iraq or Afghanistan (or anywhere else) and I have some fellow Marines out to my funeral to present a flag to my Mother and fire a volley over my casket, the ACLU wants them directed NOT even bow their heads, should they choose to do so.

So, I guess my question is: Where EXACTLY is the similiarity?

3.11.07  
Blogger travis said...

Your points are all well made. I happen to think that many of them are fallacious and based on subjective sentiment. I submit to you thie weekend's activities in Tehran- A celebration of the anniversary of terrorists holding US Citizens hostage. On their own sovereign grounds.

Would America do that?

We like to celebrate things, sure. And we have a wonderful record on taking warfighting to extremes. But we never publicly celebrated annihilating Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Nor did we rant about how terrible Germany was after fire-bombing Dresden.

I'll have more to say later in a response blog, I'll let you know when I post it.

5.11.07  

Post a Comment

<< Home